3D Mark 2008 'Vantage' Guru3d Records - Page 6

Frag-master · 04-29-2008, 12:53 | posts: 2,443 | Location: United Kingdom, Essex

also loading 175.12 drivers

Joshua · 04-29-2008, 13:31 | posts: 6,830 | Location: Seattle, WA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ekajaya"VaLvE"

I see, but compgeek89 said that P should be removed from the score.

And Hilbert had it in. Who ya gonna believe?

Copey · 04-29-2008, 14:20 | posts: 10,646 | Location: U.K

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua

And Hilbert had it in. Who ya gonna believe?

But hilberts score hasnt been added, actually none have lol

mft4 · *Last edited by mft4; 04-29-2008 at 14:43.*

its still not certain whether hwbot will support 3dmark vantage http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=858

at least not with hwbot points.

proFits · 04-29-2008, 14:58 | posts: 5,749 | Location: Montreal

[hwbot] 5107 - C2D E8400 @ 3.6 Ghz; GeForce 8800 GT @stock [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=18086

compgeek89 · 04-29-2008, 15:09 | posts: 4,769 | Location: On the Cutting Edge of Technology

There seems to be some kind of problem with the bot right now. I am going to see if hwbot can sort it out. When I force a bot scan from the CP it complains that scores with P in them are invalid or that you're trying to use it as your name and that's invalid. Until HW does something about that you'll have to leave the letter out. As for the scores without a letter, hwbot is recording them but it can't edit the post for some reason.

hwbot has always sorted problems out before, I'm sure they'll be able to this time.

Mannerheim · 04-29-2008, 16:59 | posts: 4,479 | Location: Finland / Helsinki

3DMark Score P3523
CPU Score 4745
Graphics Score 3244

RS-X · *Last edited by Joshua; 04-29-2008 at 21:35.*

Edit by Joshua: This is not the place to be asking for serials. Keep it off the forum.

hotshot100 · 04-29-2008, 18:10 | posts: 81 | Location: Canada

after 175.12 I got +120

Main test results
3DMark Score P9756 3DMarks
CPU Score 8389
Graphics Score 10317

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=31610

Picture of the setup here : (still my old 8800gtx)

http://s62.photobucket.com/albums/h9.../Watercooling/

Kohlendioxidus · **3DMarkVantage SUCKS! -** 04-29-2008, 18:11 | posts: 1,257 | Location: Germany

yo...

CPU 3658
GPU 3027

quite dissapointed, the first GPU test is quite ****

. The second one is much cooler

, but hey Futuremark this is all you can come with???

I'll test later with other ATI drivers (w. hotfix for Vantage)....maybe.

RemCo · 04-29-2008, 18:12 | posts: 349 | Location: Holland

Trial version using 174.53 driver,
Score P5306 3DMarks
CPU Score 5736
Graphics Score 5176

http://service.futuremark.com/home.a...&resultType=19

Copey · 04-29-2008, 18:16 | posts: 10,646 | Location: U.K

Just ot let you know, the Agiea physX card gives a couple of thousand on the CPU score, but only gave me about a 200 point boost on the final score.

rainbowhans

my 1st Vantage results

Fahim · 04-29-2008, 21:32 | posts: 188 | Location: In Front Of My PC

I finished my benchmarking with both 8800 GTS and HD 3870 in stock and overclocked mode...

Leadtek PX8800 GTS 640MB (513,1584) 174.93

Leadtek PX8800 GTS 640MB (650,2000) 174.93

ATI RADEON HD 3870 512MB (800,2340) 08.4

ATI RADEON HD 3870 512MB (800,2340) 08.4 Hotfix

ATI RADEON HD 3870 512MB (850,2400) 08.4 Hotfix

In stock speed, 8800 GTS is marginally slower than 3870, but with hotfix, 3870 is a better performer. But when overclocked, 8800 GTS is much faster than HD 3870. Maybe because I didn't overclock my HD 3870 further. I am gonna try ForceWare 175.12 and compare the stock results next.

billaa · *Last edited by billaa; 04-30-2008 at 01:15.*

CPU Score 14,582
Graphics Score 5944

[hwbot] 6978 - Asus 8800GTS 512Mb @ 810/2230 | Intel Q9450 @ 3593Mhz Air [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=37231

chief Dave · *Last edited by chief Dave; 05-01-2008 at 02:28.*

[hwbot] 6581 - visiontech 3870X2 quad fire - Core 2 E8400 @ 4.05GHz H2O [/hwbot]
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=39444
no oc on the gpus, ati hot fix, core @ 1.30

The hot fix drivers work very well and the bench actualy looks nice and d=is rendered right now, with out artifacts and crap. Finaly some decent drivers. Time to crank it up and see what is does.
Dave
PS

3DMark Score P6581 3DMarks
CPU Score 8238
Graphics Score 6168
Test Results
Graphics Tests
Jane Nash 13.39 FPS
New Calico 22.91 FPS
CPU Tests
AI Test 1109.04 Operations/s
Physics Test 11.7 Operations/s
Feature Tests
Texture Fill Test 1441.54 GTexels/s
Color Fill Test 10.48 GPixels/s
Pixel Shader 30.47 FPS
Stream Out 6.46 FPS
GPU Particles 14.43 FPS
Perlin Noise 88.82 FPS

chief Dave · *Last edited by chief Dave; 05-01-2008 at 02:28.*

[hwbot] 7468 - visiontech 3870X2 quad fire - Core 2 E8400 @ 4.05GHz H2O [/hwbot]
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=39666
GPUs to 900 core 999 mem, nice delta.
Dave

Main test results
3DMark Score P7468 3DMarks
CPU Score 8308
Graphics Score 7224
Test Results
Graphics Tests
Jane Nash 17.78 FPS
New Calico 24.66 FPS
CPU Tests
AI Test 1109.57 Operations/s
Physics Test 12.02 Operations/s
Feature Tests
Texture Fill Test 1504.46 GTexels/s
Color Fill Test 11.07 GPixels/s
Pixel Shader 32.14 FPS
Stream Out 6.51 FPS
GPU Particles 14.84 FPS
Perlin Noise 93.9 FPS

StarvinMarvinDK · 04-30-2008, 07:18 | posts: 903 | Location: Denmark

[hwbot] P10688 Q9450 @ 3600 SLI 8800GT 512 @ 725/1100/1836 All H2O [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=33523

mikeysg · 04-30-2008, 12:50 | posts: 1,790 | Location: Babylon 5

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief Dave

[hwbot] 7468 - visiontech 3750X2 quad fire - Core 2 E8400 @ 4.05GHz H2O [/hwbot]
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=39666
GPUs to 900 core 999 mem, nice delta.
Dave

Main test results
3DMark Score P7468 3DMarks
CPU Score 8308
Graphics Score 7224
Test Results
Graphics Tests
Jane Nash 17.78 FPS
New Calico 24.66 FPS
CPU Tests
AI Test 1109.57 Operations/s
Physics Test 12.02 Operations/s
Feature Tests
Texture Fill Test 1504.46 GTexels/s
Color Fill Test 11.07 GPixels/s
Pixel Shader 32.14 FPS
Stream Out 6.51 FPS
GPU Particles 14.84 FPS
Perlin Noise 93.9 FPS

Is this with Cat 8.4? If yes, you really ought to try the hotfix driver from ATi, my score shot up greatly with it.

jecky · 04-30-2008, 13:49 | posts: 1 | Location: Slovakia

hello
this is my first post :-)

my result: preset - performance
3dmark score P5457
cpu score 5066
graphics score 5601

with 175.12 drivers

Barry J · *Last edited by Barry J; 10-07-2008 at 17:17. Reason: New 260GTX 216*

[hwbot] 12110 - BFG 260GTX - Phenom 9750 @ 2700 GHz [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=434001

wkmgt · 04-30-2008, 16:46 | posts: 195

With 175.12 drivers:

[hwbot] 9315 - E6850 @ 4050 Air / SLI 8800GTX 677 x 1077 Air H3-03 Plus [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=45701

proFits · 04-30-2008, 17:03 | posts: 5,749 | Location: Montreal

wkmgt Don't put the P in it'll cause conflicts when the bot is up

chaotic1 · 05-01-2008, 00:12 | posts: 2,855

my system must suck lol , i thought i might have got more

. just goes to show how weak my system is or something is wrong with the drivers or something (8.4 hotfix drivers)

3DMark Score P4174 3DMarks
CPU Score 4315
Graphics Score 4129

suzukhawaii · 05-01-2008, 00:39 | posts: 264 | Location: Hawaii

[hwbot] 5427 - C2D E6300 @ 3.4 Ghz; 8800 GTX @ 660/1050 [/hwbot]
http://service.futuremark.com/home.a...&resultType=19

3DMark Score: P5427
CPU Score: 5384
Graphics Score: 5441

Is this good? Should I be getting higher or is this about right for my system?