3D Mark 2001 Guru3d Records - Page 15

glenboy · 10-11-2007, 22:49 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

[hwbot] 75258 - 2 x hd2900xt @ 855/987- intel e6850 @ 4.035 ghz on water - 2gb pc6400 @ ddr897 3 4 3 9 [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9270237

chispy · 10-11-2007, 23:21 | posts: 6,410 | Location: Puerto Rico

Great score M8

, job well done.
Cheers bro.

chispy.

glenboy · *Last edited by glenboy; 10-12-2007 at 00:16.*

hiya chispy we just have to keep pushing

[hwbot] 75474 - 2 x hd2900xt @ 857/981- intel e6850 @ 4.035 ghz on water - 2gb pc6400 @ ddr897 3 4 3 9 [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9270259

chispy · 10-12-2007, 01:01 | posts: 6,410 | Location: Puerto Rico

we think alike

Cheers m8

glenboy · 10-12-2007, 01:07 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

we love it chispy don't we

chispy · 10-12-2007, 01:08 | posts: 6,410 | Location: Puerto Rico

Quote:

Originally Posted by glenboy

we love it chispy don't we

Yes we do bro

Hunt3r · 10-28-2007, 16:28 | posts: 31

WoW this bench brings back some fond 478 phase memories

Here is a quick run I will try to improve on it later

[hwbot] 69613 3dmarks - BFG 8800GTX @ 658Mhz/1574Mhz/2140Mhz - C2Q Q6600 @ 4032Mhz [/hwbot]

3dMark01

Hunt3r · 10-28-2007, 17:47 | posts: 31

I made a couple adjustments ... I wish I could get 06 stable at these speeds

[hwbot] 70817 3dmarks - BFG 8800GTX @ 658Mhz/1574Mhz/2156Mhz - C2Q Q6600 @ 4068Mhz [/hwbot]

3dMark01

glenboy · 10-28-2007, 18:48 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

nice overclock on the quad there hunt3r, nice going

Hunt3r · 10-28-2007, 18:56 | posts: 31

Thx glen, I run it daily for gaming at 4.0 but I have to drop it down a bit for 3dMark06 but I can bump it up for other benchies.

glenboy · 10-28-2007, 19:35 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

yes 3d06 takes its toll generally its 50-100 mhz less benchable on the cpu than 3d01,and 05 but on a quad on p5b thats a great overclock you got what vcore does it need above 4ghz 1.65?

Hunt3r · 10-28-2007, 19:45 | posts: 31

I usually run 1.625v @ 4Ghz but every small step after that takes another .025v and the max on this board is 1.7v. I would like to v-mod both my mobo and 8800 but its a tough choice with so much new technology so close .....

The way my luck works I would v-mod my 8800 and next week they would release the next gen cards and I would be stuck with a card I could not sell.

glenboy · 10-28-2007, 20:33 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

yes thats what happens , the technology moves so fast i have a p5w-dh which is a bit out of date but still pulls in the numbers till the next upgrade, i had a quad on my p5w and it did not like it so might get a quad with next motherboard upgrade

Reality|Bites · 11-02-2007, 15:14 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

[hwbot] 75450 - SLI ASUS/eVGA 8800 Ultra @655/2300 | C2D E6600 @ 3.8Ghz [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9280713

Reality|Bites · 11-02-2007, 15:25 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

[hwbot] 75668 - SLI ASUS/eVGA 8800 Ultra @680/2360 | C2D E6600 @ 3.8Ghz [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9280717

chief Dave · 11-02-2007, 15:40 | posts: 339 | Location: Augusta

Nice score man! Nice jump in score with the jump in core and mem. Congrats!
Dave

glenboy · 11-02-2007, 18:45 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

nice going again those ultras in sli get a massive nature score

Reality|Bites · 11-02-2007, 18:59 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

Yeah it was the only test I saw massive gains from, Other tests were sometimes slower than with a single card.

Crysis now runs at 50fps instead of 27fps now @ 1920x1200, Although it doesn't feel as smooth for some reason??

Single Ultra
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9269066

SLI Ultra
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9280756

Reality|Bites · 11-02-2007, 19:33 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

Glenboy

What results do you get when you run your CPU at 3.8Ghz?

Just to let me compare.

glenboy · 11-03-2007, 01:30 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

hiya reality
this is an old project at 3.8ghz ish with the 2 cards at stock speeds

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9233561

Reality|Bites · 11-03-2007, 14:17 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

Thanks

So why am I 10-50 fps slower in every test then I have 300fps more in the nature test?

drivers? configuration?

glenboy · 11-03-2007, 16:04 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

i think its just the nature test the ultras handle it a lot better than the 2900s hence the overall score is higher

glenboy · 11-17-2007, 09:14 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

[hwbot] 76208 - 2 x hd2900xt @ 857/988 - intel e6850 @ 4.035 ghz on water - 2gb pc6400 @ ddr897 3 4 3 9 [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9288525

Reality|Bites · 11-17-2007, 16:16 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

Grrrr, As soon as a saw your post I tried my hardest to get 3.9Ghz stable, I got as far as the 4th test (Dragothic high) and the system froze.

Can I have a loan of your chip please

Are you thinking of getting a pair of 3870's now?

glenboy · 11-17-2007, 17:59 | posts: 1,182 | Location: UK

hiya reality
no the only ones i might consider is 3870x2 dual chip ones if they come out, the next toy is the asus maximus extreme i have just ordered ,looking forward to that, i have no ddr3 memory yet though , Its a fortune atm, its really infuriating benching the system on the edge , on mine i can bench at 4.035 with everything and sometimes 4.063 but only sometimes, i hate it when its near the end of a 3dmark and you think its gonna do it then it freezes or reboots