Wanna Benchmark test your whole system? click here to find out more - Page 2

Blaise · 02-25-2006, 21:08 | posts: 1,278 | Location: Sydney, Australia

Anyone running RAID seems to get a bit of a boost in this benchmark

Herbert0100 · 02-25-2006, 21:12 | posts: 1,541 | Location: uk

774 here raptor 10000 rpm might of been an advantage

Raikku · 02-25-2006, 21:45 | posts: 244 | Location: Finland

Only 490.

But when i see that other guy with 3700+ got also 491, so maybe that's correct.

Hmm, i need new machine with lotsa mo' power.

pysik · 02-25-2006, 21:57 | posts: 329 | Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

i got 964.1...is it that the lower the mark the better or higher cus i dont understand this

Mic · 02-25-2006, 22:59 | posts: 351 | Location: N Wales

Higher is better;
Your score seems odd

pysik · 02-25-2006, 23:02 | posts: 329 | Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

yea that is what i was thinking that is why i asked the question

Mic · 02-25-2006, 23:08 | posts: 351 | Location: N Wales

Maby your systems more powerful than you imagined;

And you got lucky

pysik · 02-25-2006, 23:46 | posts: 329 | Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

just ran it again and got 1117.0

.:sTreeT:. · 02-25-2006, 23:57 | posts: 457 | Location: Canada

no no no.....if you want a general system score use bapco sysmark or pcmark....that's what you should be using if you want your overall score seeing as how they are both well known benchmarks and you see mags like comp. shopper use bapco to get the overall system mark when they review....

.:sTreeT:. · 02-26-2006, 00:00 | posts: 457 | Location: Canada

ahahahah you got to be kidding me...this test is a joke somehow peple with single 6600gt's with 1 gig of ram and athlon 64 3200+ are more than doubling people who have 2x 7800 gtx's and athlon 64 x2 4400+ with 2 gigs of ram.....i have one thing to say...BAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

OCZSpeedJunky · **Hmmmmmmmmm......... -** 02-26-2006, 00:01 | posts: 676 | Location: WI

Just downloaded this so I'll have to go see what score pops up. Back in a few.

mykledw · 02-26-2006, 00:08 | posts: 1,481 | Location: Las Vegas, New Mexico

542.0 for me..........I guess it's time for an upgrade or 2 or 3 or 4.........LOL

Pabl0z · 02-26-2006, 00:18 | posts: 65 | Location: Finland

782.1 ....

compgeek89 · 02-26-2006, 01:28 | posts: 4,769 | Location: On the Cutting Edge of Technology

And yet only 584 for my dual GTs and opteron @ 2.8

this is sad

OCZSpeedJunky · **Screwy -** 02-26-2006, 04:53 | posts: 676 | Location: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by pysik

just ran it again and got 1117.0

Ok, am I the only one here that thinks this score is whacked?? I hit 482.1 with CPU clocked to 2.5ghz, FSB to 2500mhz, RAM DDR400 @ 502mhz, and my 6600GT at 600/1200mhz?? Hell, even CompG and Pablo got smoked by this score, and they are running a helluva bit more powerful PC's than me or this person who hit 1117?? Think something is off here if ya ask me. I'll stick with the better known benchmarks.

monalac · 02-26-2006, 05:17 | posts: 322 | Location: India

im gonna try this test after 4 hours and gonna post results

lol. cause im downloading audigy4 pro .iso

so that takes time

so hold on guys.i dont think ill score more then 400

any guesses about my score on my config on left

card oc to 590core 1200mem

phrozin · *Last edited by phrozin; 02-26-2006 at 06:10.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by pysik

just ran it again and got 1117.0

there is no way your rig would run that with your spec's my rig with my 4800@ 3150 288x11 my x1900xtx @780/ 850mhz on raid 0 mem @288 2-5,2,2,6,t1 ran 885.8

some thing is up the creek with your score 3200 a64 and 66gt dont out run x2's and x1900's your not running speed xp are we your run is bogus or you are cheating

OCZSpeedJunky · 02-26-2006, 06:44 | posts: 676 | Location: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by phrozin

there is no way your rig would run that with your spec's my rig with my 4800@ 3150 288x11 my x1900xtx @780/ 850mhz on raid 0 mem @288 2-5,2,2,6,t1 ran 885.8

some thing is up the creek with your score 3200 a64 and 66gt dont out run x2's and x1900's your not running speed xp are we your run is bogus or you are cheating

Thanks for saying it bro, lol. Something is up with that score 'cuz I have a similiar system, with what I consider a much better video card, audigy 2 zs audio, & OCZ Plat. @ 500mhz 3-3-2-5 1T, etc., and he is almost triple my score?? He has onboard audio, a somewhat slower video card, and the exact same CPU with 1GB RAM?? Something isn't right.

OCZSpeedJunky · 02-26-2006, 07:07 | posts: 676 | Location: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by pysik

just ran it again and got 1117.0

Ok, now I know how this "score" came about. Pretty slick. Amazing what can be done with some software. Hell, atleast be honest who cares what ya got for a fricken score, other than you obviously. I just ran it again, and did a comparison with what we can see of his scores, and I score higher in 4 of the areas that can be seen, so it was clearly a doctored score. I am not one to accuse people of anything, but this is just dumb. lol Just post your score, who cares how high or low ya got. I outscored his CPU by almost 50 alone, yet he got 1117?? lol NOT. Just take a look at what ya can see of his individual areas and compare them to your guys, you'll see it's been screwed with. For the hell of it here's what I just got. Have a ball.

pysik · *Last edited by pysik; 02-26-2006 at 16:07.*

For the people that dont believe me here you go pictures of the thing. I dont want to be considered a cheater or whatever you call it

[img=http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/2420/almost1rw.th.jpg]
[img=http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/3629/almost21kj.th.jpg]
i also think this test is wack! I think we should stick to known benchmarks

DoubleStack · 02-26-2006, 17:45 | posts: 259 | Location: Fort Benning, GA

No you arent. Running my CPU at 2.41, having 2 7800GTX's in SLi, and having sata2 drives and only getting 564.8 tells me this benchmark is complete garbage. I get pretty high scores in other benchmarks so I dont know what the deal is with this one. *Uninstall*

BigJ · 02-26-2006, 21:27 | posts: 132 | Location: Springfield, Ohio

467 but i was getting some crazy high fps on graphics benchmarks

Sinacle · 02-26-2006, 22:41 | posts: 204 | Location: The Netherlands

Hhahaahaaha this test is seriously awesome

It doesn't even make it to the start haha

OCZSpeedJunky · **WhAcKeD!!! -** 02-26-2006, 22:57 | posts: 676 | Location: WI

Yes, I have to absolutely say this test is whacked. Looking at pysik's scores and such, I scored higher in every single test area, yet his final score is higher?? How the hell does that work lol. I agree, time to just stick with the good well known benchmark software and uninstall this thing, 'cuz something if waaaaaaaayy off lol Peeps like phrozin, compg, PabloZ, etc., have some pretty strong systems and even they can't hit 1,000 on this thing. Alls well that ends well. Thanks for the chuckle though.

bludgeon · 02-26-2006, 23:14 | posts: 9 | Location: UK BATH

1458.5 for all tests