Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > General Chat > Digital Photography, Home and Portable Electronics
Digital Photography, Home and Portable Electronics Chat and share your photography skills or talk about digital cameras. Portable Mp3 player not in your grove? How about that snazzy widescreen with 7.1 audio?


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
abula
Master Guru
 
abula's Avatar
 
Videocard: Galaxy GTX580
Processor: Intel i5 2500K
Mainboard: ASUS Gene Z
Memory: GSkill Snipper 1600
Soundcard: Realtek + Emotiva + NSP1
PSU: Sesonic X-660
Default 05-27-2002, 15:05 | posts: 685 | Location: Guatemala

Hi,<br>
<br>
I just want to be sure that component cables are much much better than S video.<br>
<br>
Right now I have everything in S video, and the image on my Wega is great, a friend told me that Component wouldn't make much difference, but I have read on the net and on magazines that the best way to hook up any video component is by using component cables.<br>
<br>
Maybe somebody can tell me is it worth to change to component?<br>
<br>
Thanks for any replies.<br>
Abula
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#2)
=MANTIS=
 
Videocard:
Processor:
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU:
Default 06-04-2002, 09:35 | posts: n/a

I guess it depends on what it is worth to you. Component video is better, but will you be able to visually tell the difference? Maybe on a high end TV with a high end source. If you have a regular TV set like me (non HDTV) then why bother changing?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
truedawg4life
 
Videocard:
Processor:
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU:
Default 06-10-2002, 02:07 | posts: n/a

thats strange i was under the belief that s video is superior to RCA(componet or is it composite???) um never mind this post im not sure if what im thinking of composite or componet.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Heimhenge
 
Videocard:
Processor:
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU:
Default 06-15-2002, 23:29 | posts: n/a

Here's the scoop ...<br>
<br>
BEST: component video (separates R,G,B signals and, I think, brightness as well)<br>
<br>
BETTER: S-video (separates luminance and chrominance signals)<br>
<br>
WORST: composite (all the video signals on one channel)<br>
<br>
Will you notice a difference? Between composite and S-video for sure. Between component and S-video ... depends on your monitor and source quality.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#5)
WeaZel
 
Videocard:
Processor:
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU:
Default 06-17-2002, 06:31 | posts: n/a

I got a 52" RCA and my DVD Player's piped to my receiver then to the TV all through S-video

my old mans got a 51" HDTV with component going from his dvd to his tv and i'll tell ya this, you can tell the difference the colours are brighter and it's a better all around picture....bastard
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
tostador
 
Videocard:
Processor:
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU:
Cool 06-18-2002, 21:20 | posts: n/a

Component cables are in my experience, much much better than s-video. Granted, a lot depends on the quality of the wires and the output signal, but components are much more likely to be better.

In my case, plugging my playstation 2 into a 36" Wega with an s-video cable, the clarity and resolution was definitely there, but there was some pretty bad shadowing with any orange colors (i.e. the orange was offset by about 1/4" to the left), and there was some noticeable interference patterns (moving graininess around edges). Upgrading to component wires, the image was, for all intents and purposes, perfect.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2012, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.