is 14,011 on 3DMark Score low or just right for my system

Silent Option

http://service.futuremark.com/servle...&projectType=6

this is what I'm getting after i did some tweaking. Odd thing someone with Geforce4 Ti4200 64MB DDR videocard got a 100 points higher then me.

I have an Albatron Geforce4 Ti4800SE. I thought two 512 XMS Corsair DDR RAM and this card would get a higher score then his Geforce4 Ti4200 8x. Note: I overclock my GPU to the same setting as his own and my score is lower

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6448100

BLyarx · 05-12-2003, 02:02 | posts: 2,983

Your First Link Is Dead And Your Second Link Is Nice...

Good Score....!

god4sure · 05-12-2003, 03:16 | posts: 1,264 | Location: In Pixel's Monitor

Yeah that score is nice. I am sure that that P 4 reference score is mine though

Silent Option · *Last edited by Silent Option; 05-12-2003 at 12:50.*

what pentium iv reference. that guy was using the same mobo and processor as mine cept his videocard was 64MB ti4200 and mine is 128MB geforce4 ti4800se

Detailed Test Results
3DMark Score
(3D marks) 14063 - my system

14132 - his system

Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200

Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200

Driver Version 6.14.01.4351 6.14.01.4351

Video Memory 128 MB 64 MB

Program Version 3DMark2001 SE 3DMark2001 SE

Resolution 1024x768 32bit 1024x768 32bit

Texture Format Compressed Compressed

FSAA Disabled Disabled

Z-Buffer Depth 24bit 24bit

Frame Buffer Double Double

Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L D3D Pure Hardware T&L

Quote:

Originally posted by god4sure
Yeah that score is nice. I am sure that that P 4 reference score is mine though

Graek · 05-12-2003, 22:37 | posts: 532 | Location: Hollywood, Florida

I havent tried to overclock this yet. Im reluctant to do it even though I overclocked the hell out of my last system.

Some the setting look like chinese to me.

05-13-2003, 23:39 | posts: n/a

4800se isn't that great and the 128 mem is slower than the 64 mem

Silent Option · 05-14-2003, 01:01 | posts: 583 | Location: Fort Gordon

i did tweaking the Geforce4 Ti4800SE some more now I got 14,142

Neal · 05-27-2003, 14:09 | posts: 1,595 | Location: UK

woah, i cant even get 10,000, but i know y

L10nH34Rt · 05-28-2003, 07:06 | posts: 233 | Location: Athens, Greece

You're using the same mobo chipset as me xept i'm getting 104xx!
I'll be switching to a new mobo shortly (Gigabyte GA-8SQ800) and some new DDR400 modules that will be running w/ dual channel and I'm expecting a difference in benchmark scores don't you think?

Graek · 05-28-2003, 07:11 | posts: 532 | Location: Hollywood, Florida

Youll defnitely get a nice increase with mobo. Very good board.

Neal · *Last edited by Neal; 05-28-2003 at 09:51.*

im getting the abit IC7 (basic version), ive been looking around and it seems intel are more stable and have less compatibility problems:

431W Enermax EG465P-VE PSU=£52.88
Mushkin 512Mb kit DDR PC-3200 Dual Channel = £112
Abit IC7 "Canterwood" (Socket 478) Motherboard (MB-031-AB)=£118
and a Radeon 9800 pro 128mb or 256mb(SDRAM)...cant w8, it wil kick ass

not forgetting a new case

CSE-MID-C-DX01W=£45.83

wow lionheart...we are brothers!

05-29-2003, 21:42 | posts: n/a

Silent...those are good scores....but.....your fillrates absolutely suck. You must be o/c'ing to the point of no return here pretty soon.

05-31-2003, 15:45 | posts: n/a

THAT can not BE!!!!
I have the same GRAKA! (geforce 4 ti 4800se)
and i have 9800 Points!!!!!!

XP 2000+
768 MB DDR @266

What make i wrong?