3D Mark 2011 Guru3d Records

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/17427

7753 on a 5970.

 

Yep wont run the physics or combined tests either. Graphics ones are fine.

 

Man this is so wierd. This error came up now:

 

working fine now it seems.
P4595
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/20949

 

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/20904

P6007 with a 3.2 GHz Intel Core i7-920 and a GTX 580 at stock speeds.

I'm going to run the Extreme benchmark now but I have to say that this is a very pretty 3DMark and a vast improvement on the dulltastic Vantage. The lighting and depth of field effects are incredible and it really does look impressive visually, making the most of the video card. Vantage might have taxed the card too but it was fugly IMO.

P.S. I'm running the purchased Advanced version and all the tests run perfectly fine for me, including the CPU+GPU ones.

 

Better result with mild GPU overclock. (935/1095)

3DMark ScoreP4125


Graphics score4120


Physics Score4275


Combined Score3954

 

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/20872


3DMark Score
P7621

Graphics score
8302

Physics Score
6580

Combined Score
5533

 

P3864 3DMarks11

Spec is on my sig

I must say that I'm impressed with the graphic quality :nerd:

Edit: Detailed result
3DMark ScoreP3864
Graphics score3842
Physics Score4068
Combined Score3748
GraphicsTest120.53 FPS
GraphicsTest219.61 FPS
GraphicsTest323.62 FPS
GraphicsTest410.27 FPS
PhysicsTest12.92 FPS
CombinedTest17.44 FPS

 

Your CPU physx performance is low, my Q9650 still smokes any AMD CPU clock for clock but no match against an I7.

 

Workload Single init returned error message: DXGI call IDXGIFactory1::CreateSwapChain failed:

The target window or output has been occluded. The application should suspend rendering operations if possible.

DXGI_STATUS_OCCLUDED

 

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/22257

X1962

I'm quite pleased with that even if many of the benchmarks ran as 5 to 15 fps slideshows! Still extremely pretty to watch and literally CG quality. Very impressive. It's quite amusing to think that in three short years the graphics cards then will likely make light work of this demo and that the demo itself will probably look dated. I guess that's what makes computer technology so exciting really; the fact that it never stops advancing.

 

I got P4812 w/ CPU OC 3.23GHz (230MHz x 14) - http://3dmark.com/3dm11/19946

you look my post #7 - CPU at stock

the difference of CPU between stock and OC is nothing for graphics tests except 2 physics and combined tests. therefore the my CPU bottlenecked is "zero"!!

 

P6025,X1964 advanced edition, gpu @ default, cpu 3340mhz

 

reran more oc on the gpu P5991 3DMarks, http://3dmark.com/3dm11/22899
could probly push for 6000 but meh im fine with it

 

I was getting errors in the CPU tests, had to stop everest and a few other processes so it runs normally. Way to go Futuremark :3eyes:

Score Link

 

caution: Too hot may be dangerous with OC enabled for GPU. lol

I may not enable oc on GPU because my gpu has still stock cooler and got too hot (83ºC most and 90ºC for furmark and my ambient room - +/-16ºC).

 

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/23006 :banana:

P8512 3DMarks on 5970

 

Yay, P5131. Look here: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/23565. It's the highest score for an i7 860 and a single HD 5870!!!!

 

I would try closing any background programs, if your GPU is clocked please try a run at stock clocks to see if the clocking has an effect..

 

So a 200 MHz overclock on the CPU nets you around P18 points based on my score of P6007 on the i7-920 at 3.2 GHz with the same card as you?