hwbot] 5693 - 8800 GT Sonic - Core 2 E8400 @ 4 GHz, Big typhoon/Air [/hwbot] CPU Score 8122 Graphics Score 5177 http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=6404&resultType=19
3DMark Score P5511 CPU Score - 8364 Graphics Score - 4948 http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=2544&resultType=19 seems a bit low to me:nerd:
Who wants a trial key? first post gets lol Unused, should work, I'll send you my account log on and I'll change my password in 24hrs
P5270 CPU 6791 GPU 4904 Driver - 174.74 I got a reasonable score I think. I haven't had any crashes or errors yet. It does suck a bit for a gaming benchmark when it favours quad cores so much as nearly all games don't take advantage of them. I guess it has to be ahead of current systems and in a year or so new games will have the support. It just sucks a bit now!
Hell...I was kinda excited about it at first. Was thinking for them to charge for it, they must have put some really hard work into it. Been more creative, and with better looking visuals than 06. This is a downgrade from 06 imo. Some of the spaceship stuff looks kind of cool, but that's about it. I know everyone will have a different opinion, but I was expecting a little more than what it is...especially since it beats your system down, and looks like crap doing it.
Denny got some nice nvidia´s...somewhat same set my wife use to have. After 3 kids, her nvidia´s are just ATI radeon´s 9000 series...
got 48something, i don't care. this masterpiece looks like ****.uke2: seeing the ageia driver installing almost made me instantly uninstall it before benching.:bang: no havok and fps lower than 30 for graphics in performance mode looking like unreal with funny lighteffects?:stewpid: this isn't state of the art. i hoped to get an experience in graphics-goes-looking-like-reality, and got really disappointed. however, with the great idea of letting people pay for experiencing this more than once they've shot themselves into the knee. however, i'm shure they will make their game look a lot better on mainstream hardware to show us, how graphics are made to earn lots of money. if not: :stewpid: again...
Score as follows - P7698 CPU score - 15081 Graphics score - 6618 But something's definitely FUBAR'd, I get distorted image at times. This is with Cat 8.4, will DL the hotfix driver and give it a spin again.
hi mikeysg there is a catalyst vantage hotfix now available link here http://support.ati.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=894, this is the original thread on extreme http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=186029 just thought it would be of help , downloading vantage now myself but slllllloooooowwwwly
Gent's this thread is meant for HWBOT results, please do so and use the following format: PHP: [hwbot] P15974 - BFG 9800 GX2 Quad SLI - Core 2 QX9770 @ 3937 GHz H2O [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=10101
[hwbot] 11054 - 2x XFX 8800 GTS 512 SLI @ 752/1800/1080 - Core 2 Q6600 @ 3.5 GHz Air [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=3344CEF8B4CBF910D49B0EBD05955E3D
I did a run with the hotfix driver, there's less distorted PQ, it is still present, so I hope ATi will look into it. Meanwhile, here's the score with my CPU at 3.8ghz, GPU's doing 850/936 (1872 effective) - P12767 CPU Score 15249 Graphics Score 12110 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=11889
nice score mikeysg now get those hwbot format tags round it and lets get this thread going,seems with 3dmark vantage that quad gpus really kick ass in this bench similar setup as hilberts but with 2 x 9800gtx in sli instead scores around 10,000 so a bigger difference to 06 which the quad gpus get about a 15% boost, do you have to run all the tests to get an overall score or just some of the tests like in other 3dmarks
The powers that be would like you all to go out and buy 4 x GFX cards and then pay for the priviledge of retesting with your new kit. That is all this benchmark says to me
