Return of AMD FX: My OC'd AMD FX 8150 review with OC'd 6990 - First Results UP!

Discussion in 'Processors and motherboards AMD' started by polyzp, Jan 6, 2012.

  1. Kinfa

    Kinfa Master Guru

    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    11
    GPU:
    XFX RX580 8GB
    Finally these two morons are recognized. Their unique advice all over Guru3D forum is:

    "Get yourself SB 2500K or 2600K and new motherboard!"
     
  2. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    Notice the only people defending BD have AMD cpus. Every review says bd sucks. How can you release a new gen cpu and have the old thuban cpus outperform it? That makes it junk. And amd owners respond to facts by throwing petty insults instead of providing something useful.
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  3. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    you look like the troll here. here since 2006 and cannot come with a better statement than this. I have helped countless people on theses forums and agent too. can any of you trolls say the same or you just here to defend a cpu brand to your death:stewpid:
     
  4. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    if you look at that gpuz number on that bench I provided was almost a year old. lol oops 3/25/11 damn thats old
     

  5. ed6698

    ed6698 Active Member

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    pile of crap
    This is exactly the reason why I have gave up coming to this forum. I could care less about anyones 2600k. Put my system next to any Intel 2600k system during gaming and you won't see a difference.
     
  6. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    ^^^what is your cpu speed? you paired up 2 480`s with that cpu? that kind of gpu horsepower needs an i5 i7 pick whatever socket you want 1156,1366,1155,2011 at around 4ghz or more to get all you can out of those 2 gpu`s. sure all your games must be playable but you are going to run into cpu bottlenecking with a BD and 2 480`s
     
  7. bonob

    bonob Master Guru

    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    radeon hd 6970 2 go
    i'm sorry TK4ever but you put your 3dmark score p12241 on the thread with a sli 580oc according to your spec that is quite the same as a 6990oc and the op put his score on the first page and guess what, he get p10318 with a graphic score very close to you (you: 12900,the op: 12000) and you have the benefit of hardware physx (op get 7952 and you 11145), you both hav the cpu oc the same (just +200mhz for you), so i can't see the MASSIVE bottleneck you talking about with multi gpu, please and look at the score if you don't trust me.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2012
  8. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    the p score is what really counts in the end 2000 more on a very old bench at very conservative gpu speeds. 3dmark 11 is a level playing field for benchmarking amd and nvidia. that terrible physics score is due solely to the BD cpu. in vantage nvidia cards need ppu disabled for a proper score. that bench I provided was almost a year old, just to show what to provide as proof
    [​IMG]
    By tommyk2005 at 2011-05-29
    heres a vantage run with ppu disabled, run a BD cpu at any clock speed and you will see a big difference in the cpu score.
    as you can see this bench is from may 2011, it is old as well

    and I am not bragging here I know Agent can kill my scores with his msi lightnings, lots of other people can kill my scores too. just saying is all
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2012
  9. polyzp

    polyzp Guest

    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6990
    Is 12.9 k GPU score really good for two OCd 580s on a 5 ghz 2600k? I get 12k+
     
  10. polyzp

    polyzp Guest

    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6990
    vantage is ancient technology. I try to use only benchmarks updated since bulldozer's release, many of which are more optimized for its new arch. But I might post vantage scores as well to emphasize how older benchmarks make FX out to be worse than it actually is.
     

  11. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    that bench is 11 months old on a very conservative gpu clock, yours was as 990 whats the stock 6990 gpu, I understand you do not want to do a vantage run you are only interested in BD positive benches and vantage isnt one of them
     
  12. polyzp

    polyzp Guest

    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6990
    read before you respond!! lol
     
  13. bonob

    bonob Master Guru

    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    radeon hd 6970 2 go
    i was thinking 3d mark 2011 is regulary updated in order to keep a good scaling with new thech/drivers, so its never an old bench in fact.

    oh sry your were talking about the bench session
     
  14. polyzp

    polyzp Guest

    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6990
    yes 3dmark11 has a patch with bulldozer optimizations, while vantage hasnt been updated in forever.
     
  15. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    Not true, huge difference. http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/434?vs=287 at bottom are games
     

  16. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    Heres my score using clocks in specs. This is older from when i just got 580 sli. Highest bench was a bit above 15000k for gpu but i dont have that link, need to do another run.
    http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2450853
     
  17. ed6698

    ed6698 Active Member

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    pile of crap
    You sure are funny. You tell me you can see a difference by eye?

    To respond to the other person. I don't see a bottleneck at 1920x1200. Your hard drives would be a far worse bottleneck to a system then my graphics.
     
  18. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    Lol bro, if you can get 50% more fps then yes you can see a difference.. Unless you dont have a 120hz screen like me. And whi are you responding to about harddrives? I know mine arent bottlenecking anything.
     
  19. Corbus

    Corbus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    75
    GPU:
    Moist 6900 XT
    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/434?vs=288

    When you get more fps with a cpu(2500k) that is cheaper than another cpu(fx 8150) but you still buy the fx 8150 ....unless you already had a BD compatible mobo..i seriosly don't understand your logic. It doesn't matter if you don't see the difference or not in games..why buy something weaker at a more expensive price? ...i checked newegg.com for prices so if where you live the 8150 is cheaper then ignore this post.
     
  20. mR Yellow

    mR Yellow Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,935
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire R9 Fury
    Here are some benchmarks of BD. It doesn't suck half ass bad as u make it out to be.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page