Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benching

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by Pill Monster, Feb 12, 2013.

  1. Nono06

    Nono06 Guest

    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    4080 RTX
    It is most probably grouping the parameters that was present in 3.0 like:
    Shaders, Texture, Filter, Anisotropy, occlusion, refraction and volumetric.

    But what is Ultra vs High... no idea :nerd:
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2013
  2. doublee

    doublee Guest

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 690 with 100/100/500
    First attempts :


    GB Sniper X1 / i7-980x @4GHz
    Gainward 690 @ 135%/+100/+525 ==> 1150 core
    Extreme tesselation / 8x AA

    Extreme Preset, default: FPS 87.3 / Score 2198 / Min 26.9 / Max 185.5
    Custom 1920 x 1080: FPS 69.2 / Score 1744 / Min 18.8 / Max 146.7
    Custom 2560 x 1600: FPS 40.7 / Score 1025 / Min 18.4 /Max 93.6

    Gpu memory varied between 1850-2010 MB @ 2560 x 1600
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2013
  3. TwoPlusTwo

    TwoPlusTwo Guest

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2x GTX Titan SLI
  4. getsuga12

    getsuga12 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Geforce GTX870M
    definitely felt the crunch, but I'm happy that my laptop can still hold on at 1280x720. At least I know I'll be able to throw most games at this laptop at around high-max settings

    [​IMG]
     

  5. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    heres a pic, last post was just a copy/paste
    24/7 oc
    [​IMG]

    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
     
  6. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
  7. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    Guys, does the Heaven 4.0 bench makes your so far "stable" overclocks, unstable and in return crashes?

    This is the best I could do without crashing and without memory oc problems. This is at 1202MHz which is my stock(modded) frequency.

    This is probably the 1st benchmark that does not let me go beyong 1202Mhz clocks. Even at 1215MHz it crashes sometimes. I finished almost all other benches at 1241MHz usually.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2013
  8. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    1,121
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    Reset your memory to stock, see if you can do your regular core clocks.
     
  9. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
  10. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    Tried that. Even with memory at stock, it crashes above 1215MHz core. I game at 1241-1254MHz and finished almost all my benches at that clocks too.

    And just to be sure I did a Heaven 3.0 run at 1228MHz @ 19x10 8xAA extreme and got 54FPS.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2013

  11. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    [​IMG]

    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    personal best. 1306/7200 sli
    5.1ghz ht
    2133 rams
     
  12. wasteomind

    wasteomind Guest

    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3
    I see a few gtx 680 sli setups getting around 170ish fps for a max fps. I'm running sli 680s and my max is around 140ish. Anyone know why this might be coming in so low?

    Also sometimes randomly, the program will minimize to desktop as if it crashed, but i can still hear the music playing. At this point I need to force end task from the task manager to get rid of it. Am I crashing due to OC? My gpus are running stock, and I have no issues in any other programs/games.

    [​IMG]


    EDIT ok after a little testing to sync up my second cards clocks with my first one I'm having some luck:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  13. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    Seems I can't break 2k :cry:

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    Updated Score:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
  15. Ti3Kob

    Ti3Kob Guest

    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    980Ti @1505/7600
    Here's mine :
    [​IMG]
    It's far heavier than 3.0 was !
    GPUs @ 1267 / 7700 for this run - experimenting with vRAM clocks..
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2013

  16. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    true that 2560x1440 downsampled to 1080 is rough on my cards. I ran it like that as a test. 3.0 ram much higher fps
     
  17. Ti3Kob

    Ti3Kob Guest

    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    980Ti @1505/7600
    I'll try as well. What kind of performance should I expect ? Around 30% less frames per second I suppose. That would get around 58 average.. Heavy :D
     
  18. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    fps not what I expected max vs 3.0. rough. if you turn off AO you get a big boost
     
  19. Ti3Kob

    Ti3Kob Guest

    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    980Ti @1505/7600
    It was closer to 40% lower performance in fact :D

    [​IMG]
     
  20. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    run it with out AO you will get a huge boost
     

Share This Page