It is most probably grouping the parameters that was present in 3.0 like: Shaders, Texture, Filter, Anisotropy, occlusion, refraction and volumetric. But what is Ultra vs High... no idea :nerd:
First attempts : GB Sniper X1 / i7-980x @4GHz Gainward 690 @ 135%/+100/+525 ==> 1150 core Extreme tesselation / 8x AA Extreme Preset, default: FPS 87.3 / Score 2198 / Min 26.9 / Max 185.5 Custom 1920 x 1080: FPS 69.2 / Score 1744 / Min 18.8 / Max 146.7 Custom 2560 x 1600: FPS 40.7 / Score 1025 / Min 18.4 /Max 93.6 Gpu memory varied between 1850-2010 MB @ 2560 x 1600
definitely felt the crunch, but I'm happy that my laptop can still hold on at 1280x720. At least I know I'll be able to throw most games at this laptop at around high-max settings
Guys, does the Heaven 4.0 bench makes your so far "stable" overclocks, unstable and in return crashes? This is the best I could do without crashing and without memory oc problems. This is at 1202MHz which is my stock(modded) frequency. This is probably the 1st benchmark that does not let me go beyong 1202Mhz clocks. Even at 1215MHz it crashes sometimes. I finished almost all other benches at 1241MHz usually.
Tried that. Even with memory at stock, it crashes above 1215MHz core. I game at 1241-1254MHz and finished almost all my benches at that clocks too. And just to be sure I did a Heaven 3.0 run at 1228MHz @ 19x10 8xAA extreme and got 54FPS.
I see a few gtx 680 sli setups getting around 170ish fps for a max fps. I'm running sli 680s and my max is around 140ish. Anyone know why this might be coming in so low? Also sometimes randomly, the program will minimize to desktop as if it crashed, but i can still hear the music playing. At this point I need to force end task from the task manager to get rid of it. Am I crashing due to OC? My gpus are running stock, and I have no issues in any other programs/games. EDIT ok after a little testing to sync up my second cards clocks with my first one I'm having some luck:
Here's mine : It's far heavier than 3.0 was ! GPUs @ 1267 / 7700 for this run - experimenting with vRAM clocks..
true that 2560x1440 downsampled to 1080 is rough on my cards. I ran it like that as a test. 3.0 ram much higher fps
I'll try as well. What kind of performance should I expect ? Around 30% less frames per second I suppose. That would get around 58 average.. Heavy