3D Mark 2011 Guru3d Records

lol cold room,artic silver ceramique on the gpu,fan at 80% i dont think 3dmark even broke 70c lol

 

I,m using those quadro 6590 drivers what are you using? Was my first run as well..will re-run now

 

CPU: I7-950 3520MHz
GPU: 2x HIS HD6850 CF @ 825/1100
OS: Win7 ULT 64-bit
Test: Performance
Score: 7079
ORB: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/32362;jsess...dm11/32362?key=jmMKd60SAuf46SuSHMa6ZBa7EzYw9V


MILD overclock on cpu and Graphics cards, waiting for a new powersupply =)

 

i5 760 @ 4.0 GHz
4GB @ 1520 MHz CL7
GTX 460 1GB @ 950/1170/1900
Win7 64 Bit
FW 263.09

Perfomance
Score: 4404


3DMark Score - P4404
Graphics score - 4143
Physics Score - 7405
Combined Score - 3883
GraphicsTest1 - 18.89 FPS
GraphicsTest2 - 19.61 FPS
GraphicsTest3 - 25.51 FPS
GraphicsTest4 - 12.67 FPS
PhysicsTest - 23.51 FPS
CombinedTest - 18.06 FPS

Vantage still FTW, this benchmark is totally bugged, ****ty scalling, poor graphics quality.

 

I'm using the v263.09 WHQL drivers from 22/11/2010. I doubt the drivers will make much difference to the score to be honest unless you're using ones that aren't optimised for the GTX 580.

 

3222
only CPU oc, only at 3GHz
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/24750

 

CPU doesn't matter on this benchmark, I don't see any diffenrce between 3 GHz and 4 GHz on mine.

 

Weird, my scores indicate the opposite http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=3800261&postcount=62.

 

P5328

920 @ 4.2GHz
6GB Dominator @ 2000MHz
5870 @1060MHz, 5.3GHz
Win 7 64-bit

 

What you guys are seeing is your overclocks are not really stable enough to run this BM. Time to lower those insane clocks boys!

 

Those clocks on that 5870 are just :gape:

 

Yeah, its on water. I'm still lucky thou... just wish i could push higher. the card can take. never goes above 40 degrees. afterburner wont lt me push up the memory volts. i swear it's holding the card back.

 

ran this 3 times on the same settings and got 3 scores from 5850 ish to 6900 ish ?
whats that all about ?

 

Obviously something is not right with your system....

 

Damnit, just ran it with the 5870 1050 / 1325 1.3v with my cpu on 4.2Ghz and had P5226 3DMarks. Still a record for a single HD5870 with the i7 860 though

Edit: I'm on air b.t.w.

 

It look like there's several problem with SLI and the last test ( combined ), score don't match what they should ... don't wait too much about it before drivers or Futuremark fix that

 

:heh:c:

 

3DMark Score
P3145

This is using my standard gaming settings, CPU at plain 3.0 GHz and GTX 460 at 800/1900. Sure, I could crank both up, but they would not represent my normal conditions.

Graphics score
3413
Physics Score
2605
Combined Score
2465
GraphicsTest1
15.86 FPS
GraphicsTest2
16.47 FPS
GraphicsTest3
21.28 FPS
GraphicsTest4
10.12 FPS
PhysicsTest
8.27 FPS
CombinedTest
11.47 FPS

 

Keep overclocking. U might get past +20*c c:

 

Two seperate runs:

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/19907
P4148 3DMarks
Q9650 @ 3GHz (stock)
Unlocked MSI N465GTX GE (GTX470) @ 825/1650/2000
Forceware 263.09

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/23878
P4542 3DMarks
Q9650 @ 3.9GHz
Unlocked MSI N465GTX GE (GTX470) @ 825/1650/2000
Forceware 265.90 (Quadro Driver)

Funny how my graphics score is exactly the same on both runs... bottleneck ftl
http://3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/23878/3dm11/19907

Is it just me or is there something wrong with my physics score? Other Core 2 Quads are getting better physics results with lower clocks than me
I'll do a 4GHz+ run later once I get my NB fan replaced.