The GPU scores are all over the place. It seems a bit odd to see old cards scoring higher than new sh1t just because of Haswell. :thumbdown
I, being poor, could only stretch to a 280X. Tread softly because you tread on my 280X. It's weird seeing a GTX 560 scoring higher than newer cards because of a newer CPU. The 2600K still kicks ass. If it didn't I would have got something newer but the newer Intel chips are a pointless upgrade from a 2600K. I've got a better card than a 560 in my server. MY SERVER.
Multi is good since its a 6core (12thread), but single core is kinda slow compared to lets say 4770k @4.7GHz with 188cb.
Hey guys, can someone explain me why I get 60fps in the Cinebench R15 and 70fps in the R11.5 OpenGL tests with a 780@1254Mhz?? R15 Single core was 1.79@4.9Ghz iirc.
Because this useless benchmark was designed by someone who seems to think performance in OpenGL depends on what CPU u have, not your Graphics Card. Ironic since the "G" in "GL" is short for Graphics. Cinebench 11.5 was great. Cinebench 15 is worthless.
I would like to know too. I'm guessing its just the IPC scaling per core based on the multithreaded score.
I recently got an i7-960 and a DX58SO motherboard from my brother-in-law and over clocked it to 4.4GHz. My main rig which is an i5-3570k also clocked at 4.4Ghz scores lower than the i7-960 in Cinebench. IIRC the i7-960 score 658 multi thread and my i5-3570k score 626 multi thread, will check single thread performance and post pics after work. Just funny wouldn't have expected a CPU that's almost three generations older than mine to outperform it. Would you guys reckon this is normal ? Is it because the i7 is a quad core WITH hyper threading as opposed to just a quad core ? Maybe the single thread score will tell a different story, will see.
