Texture filtering - Quality...

What you do run?

For the longest time I have ran High Quality, but is the Quality setting which has the optimization worth it?

 

nope

 

I use Performance with all optimizations turned off ... works best for me ..

 

"Those who know" say that "Quality" is right setting for 3D quality, because High Quality affects more to 2D-image processing, its recommended for graphical work etc.


Thats just what i think(or what i've read).

 

Is there any real difference in quality/performance between these two modes quality/high quality?

Andy

 

I have High Quality, don't notice any diff when i put it on Quality .

 

In some cases, disabling optimizations will cause a rather big hit on filtering performance. And in some cases, the textures won't look so sharp with optimizations enabled.

 

So the best overal setting for maintaining quality/performance ... would that be the "Quality" setting?

So you only get optimisations with the quality setting not high quality?

Andy

 

I used to run High Quality, then i switched it to Quality and turned the Texture Filtering Anisotropic Samp. On, and also turned On the Texture Filtering Trilinear Optimization, didn't notice any differences at all in the quality, i just got more fps, Fear went up by 7fps for example.

Yes, when set to High Quality, the optimizations are greyed out and set to off, so you cant turn them on.

 

Sounds good dude. I think I might just do the same thing

 

if just got it on default.
high quality does't really make a diference varies on game really.
not like would notice anyway unless you really looked hard.

 

Still many ppl claim to be able to notice difference in IQ when changing drivers from officials to tweaked... LOL