Oh, excited. I hope it gets no lower than 8/10, any review that is lower than that is a TROLL REVIEW, AM I RIGHT PEOPLE?
if Mkilbride review's this game, he'll be a celebrity.. (other hand no reviews needed for the game at all, I suggest everyone play the game...no matter what)
I hated the first Witcher, first 3 times I tried it, could not enjoy it, I found it boring. Then I lost my net and it was one of the few games I had for a few months, so I was forced into it, and once I learned the combat, took an interest in the world, it was a very fun game that I didn't want to end. Fun stuff.
I dont mean to be rude or anything but whoever is spreading SH*T that the game will be getting 30FPS when on a GTX590 is waaaayyyy of the mark. Source: http://www.gamebanshee.com/previews/102772-the-witcher-2-assassins-of-kings.html ....read the 2nd comment, from the top ofc!
Source: http://www.vg247.com/2011/05/11/cd-projekt-considering-expansions-for-witcher-2-instead-of-traditional-dlc/
Traditional expansions they mean? DLC is non-traditional. Good though. Proper expansions I hope, adding at least a 1/3rd of the content the original had to me is a proper, 20$ expansion. aAAD, I read it off one of the early review sites for The Witcher 2: http://www.ripten.com/2011/05/08/the-witcher-2-250-more-ultra-quality-screens-to-die-for/ Of course that was a preview build. Still usually around the same. Oh well, it's one of the most beautiful looking games out there.
Yes as we are known in the word as barbarians ;P The only words we put space between are: vódka, food, sleep and women :bigsmile:
You reckon? I am aware of Gamespot being very dodgy. IGN recently came out and publicly stated they get no help or influence from Devs or publishers. I just think IGN recent reviewers or reviews are just attention seeking trolls.
As much as I want to get this game, I'm going to have to wait. No Funds right now plus I haven't finish the first one.