[gs]1d0EVh60ICP45moG_4AZ8MC6DNQT2GRzCFmcLm0yzT-g[/gs] [gs]1-WqmKKj8g9vM1ngwgg0FwpSpvGvBC6qpf059MkfJcsk[/gs] Add yourself in! nVidia: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d0EVh60ICP45moG_4AZ8MC6DNQT2GRzCFmcLm0yzT-g/edit?usp=sharing AMD: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-WqmKKj8g9vM1ngwgg0FwpSpvGvBC6qpf059MkfJcsk/edit?usp=sharing No ranking in particular, just making a nice list. Don't troll/cheat or whatever, its not a competition just a listing. I'll take it down if it becomes an issue. Recommended Computer Configuration: Windows7/8/8.1 operating system NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2GB or other equal video card DirectX 11 Download: http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/monster-hunter-official-benchmark-download.html Roughly 1GB Download Here is a video of the benchmark: I got the following score on a single GTX 970: 1080p MSAA4x: 63.2 FPS AVG / 36.6 FPS MIN (13,846) 1080p SMAA: 92.4 FPS AVG / 51.2 FPS MIN (20,232) 1080p AA off: 96.0 FPS AVG / 44.3 FPS MIN (21,015) 720p Ranked: 109.3 FPS AVG / 43 FPS MIN (23,928) That CRYENGINE + nVidia + 4x MSAA doe... really demanding! Post your results!
New MH benchmark, cool! I've been testing older versions few times, all were MT engine though, interesting to see CE3 :nerd: this is what I get 780GTX @ 1215mhz 720P ranked [avg: 106, min 50fps] 1080p, smaa [avg: 84, min 48fps]
Wow -_-, it can really overvolt by adaptive voltage.. Anyway, this is what I get @ 1080p 4xMSAA @ 1215mhz, I see it beats both 970 & 980 by min fps, could be higher mem bus thing.. Edit: Extraordinary ah you removed it
I also noticed it was CPU bound in a few spots and my processor really warmed up on this thing. GPUs running at stock speeds.
This benchmark is very multi core aware. i am very surprised. I thought the original cryengine only supported 2 or maybe 3 cores.
haha, when I noticed you had run with SMAA I removed my MSAA one, was gonna run it again today, but this was my score with 1080p @ MSAAx4 STOCK OVERCLOCKED
^ Not bad. Well I posted @ Asus forums about them avx2 voltage spikes, hopefully they're gonna fix it with another bios update.. I mean I saw people reporting @ ROG mobos in Crysis3 or new Splintercell, while mine didnt spike there, but now it does?
Running Win 8.1 x64 with i5-2500K@4.5GHz and GTX 670@ref-stock 347.09WHQL-HQ: default: 13,297 (avg: 60.7 fps; min: 26.5 fps) 1280x720@0xAA: 17,237 (avg: 78.7 fps; min: 30.6 fps) 800x600@0xAA: 21,218 (avg: 96.4 fps; min: 26.4 fps !?? ) I tried to reduce from 720p@0xAA to 800x600@0xAA but I cannot improve min framerate because my CPU has bottlenecked at only 4 cores used. lol But I'll buy new CPU i7 Haswell in this year.
i'll download tomorrow, hoping to beat -Tj-'s of course, minimum frames naturally. *waves over to -Tj-.
Same videocard But please do use stock speeds for GPU. Has your GTX 670 reference or overclock version? Your score is wrong because my score is less than your but my average framerate is faster than your. lool
my 970 with i7 (ivy) CPU + GPU BOUND/... i7 reached 75ºC RANKED also 1080p CPU + GPU BOUND/... i7 reached 75ºC
look my post #11 - my rest specs. GTX 670@1015 core with boost ~1130; 6220 mem default: 14,073 (avg: 64.3 fps; min: 28.5 fps) - full load 55 ºC@80% auto-fan. see difference between stock and OC.
CUSTOM BENCHMARK 1080P SMAA (strange this is the second time I ran the test and the first run gave a higher score of over 25,000 and max fps was 145fps and min was 32fps but this run gave higher min fps at 38fps and lower max fps...) RANKED BENCHMARK (First and only run) Both tests do heat up CPU quite a bit, max load after I ran the tests 3 times was 69C on the CPU and 64C on the top GPU and 55C on the bottom GPU. EDIT: Proof my CPU only got to 69C as its highest temp
Could be that 1 time SLI worked the other didnt.. Btw did you check if it overvolts cpu extra? hwinfo64 I would have to lower my OC to ~4.6ghz to get your temps though, I think. 4.6ghz is usually 6-8C lower then 4.7ghz and with 4.7ghz I got spikes up to 76-78C on hottest core0, otherwise it was ~ 50-60C.