Are you satisfied with you GTX 670/680?

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce' started by moab600, Apr 24, 2013.

?

Are you satisfied with your GTX 670/680?

Poll closed May 24, 2013.
  1. HELL Yes!!!

    41 vote(s)
    62.1%
  2. Kinda but it should been better

    22 vote(s)
    33.3%
  3. Not at all

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. No, should have bought Radeon 7950/7970

    3 vote(s)
    4.5%
  1. IcE

    IcE Don Snow

    Messages:
    10,693
    Likes Received:
    79
    GPU:
    3070Ti FE
    I must say that for what Kepler actually is, the performance is astounding really. If you compare the die size of GK104 to Tahiti, it's like half the size almost. That's why these cards sip so little power considering the clocks.
     
  2. Mysteryboi

    Mysteryboi Member Guru

    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    21
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX TITAN SC
    Stick with your 670 680 cause the titan is ****
     
  3. Sukovsky

    Sukovsky Guest

    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    76
    GPU:
    GTX 1080
    Very much satisfied, coming from a 7850!
     
  4. pimp_gimp

    pimp_gimp Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,700
    Likes Received:
    99
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 Super SLI
    Very much satisfied with my cards (purchased on release day in 2012). Everything I throw at them can get at least a steady 60 frames, although some games do stress them a little more and I see dips into the 40's and 50's (Crysis 2 with MaLDoHD Texture mod for instance). But overall I wouldn't trade these cards unless I really needed to. A few driver issues, but performance wise they're easily a 9/10 (due to drivers).
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2013

  5. moab600

    moab600 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,658
    Likes Received:
    557
    GPU:
    PNY 4090 XLR8 24GB
    yep, drivers are fine performance ultraB with this card smooth wonder how the Titan LE turn out
     
  6. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    25,358
    Likes Received:
    12,756
    GPU:
    XFX RX6800XT 16GB
    Well i am just sitting with a friend here who bought a GTX660 Ti couple of months ago, happy and satisfied even with a 660.
     
  7. RPGgamesplayer

    RPGgamesplayer Guest

    Messages:
    1,475
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    RTX 2080 TI EVGA XC
    Happy with mine just think they gimped them a bit on the memory side of things but runs everything good anyways =D

    Sli for the win hehe
     
  8. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    turns out 1280 is a no go anymore due to rising ambient temps. 1254 passed near 20 hours in heaven and valley. still happy though, but not as happy as I was in winter.
     
  9. TTtimzr

    TTtimzr Guest

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Evga&Msi GTX 780 sli
    Very happy with my 680, runs all the games i play on max with good frames at 1080p. Came from a 6950 so was abig upgrade for me

    Good overclocker as well running at 1215 / 6800 MHz and can go higher.
    Overall very pleased
     
  10. Zarich

    Zarich Member Guru

    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Galaxy GC 670
    Originally I voted #2, but I retract and say no. After years of AMD and trying Nvidia I have found these drivers to be crap. Tribes Ascend has a bug that I have to manually mess with the cfg file to fix. Trine 2 is broken in the latest betas. Tomb Raider has graphical bugs in the latest whql.
    I hate this idea that I have to roll back and forth through drivers to PICK a game to play.
     

  11. Darren Hodgson

    Darren Hodgson Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,213
    Likes Received:
    1,537
    GPU:
    NVIDIA RTX 4080 FE
    I think it has been a great card personally but on reflection I think it would have been more futureproof had it used a 384-bit bus and, thus, had 3 GB of VRAM. I'm finding a growing number of games using 2 GB of VRAM when using maxed out settings and that's at 1920x1200! And with Max Payne 3 and Hitman Absolution I cannot use the higher AA settings because of VRAM limitations. AMD seem to be a step ahead of NVIDIA when it comes to predicting what the optimal VRAM should be on high-end graphics cards as their HD 7970 card was released with 3 GB. If I had a graphics card with 3 GB of VRAM then I wouldn't really need to consider buying the GTX 780 this year.
     
  12. moab600

    moab600 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,658
    Likes Received:
    557
    GPU:
    PNY 4090 XLR8 24GB
    if the 4GB could cost as much as the 2gb, otherwise they overpriced. well we see at the refresh how things go, i might grab the 780.
     
  13. LinkDrive

    LinkDrive Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,673
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Toaster
    Coming from a HD5970, I'd say I'm really satisfied. The GTX680 is an excellent performer at high resolutions (1440p or higher).
     
  14. Anarion

    Anarion Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,599
    Likes Received:
    387
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
    Sure I am but I'd wish these had at least double the ram and wider memory bus. That will start to hurt in the future when next gen consoles come. The large amount of unified memory is problematic for PC users.
     
  15. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    Why do you think I'm going water......lol
     

  16. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    its not so bad now I edited my bios back to 1.175 volts and 7114 memory. I can do 1254 at those volts needs further testing though. kept the 150pt and 100% fans.
     

Share This Page