Nice one , you're 8th now XD, try overclocking your VRAM , and Ram, i overclocked mine from 2400 to 3000mhz and it got me some more points on the CPU score. Although i don't seem to figure out why some people with the same CPU and overclocked 100mhz less than me score 200-300 points higher in CPU test. I doubt it's because of the ram(saw they use 3200mhz+). Even tried messing with voltage some more in case it wasn't 100% stable but no change. http://www.3dmark.com/spy/35075
As you can see 280/280X perform similiar at the same clocks. Difference is within 5%. We gonna need an upgrade man.
maybe something running at the back ground try running gaming booster from GPU tweak II it gave me extra 150 points :nerd:
These benchmarks just derailed the AMD 'Async compute' hype train. No worries for the GTX1060 that is supposed to be left in the dust by the eeright: RX480 eeleft: according to some.
Oh .. I never even noticed that. It is a sorting mistake that was made in the hurry to out the benchmarks yesterday evening. Fixing.
It hasn't really, AMD cards still getting nice performance boosts with async enabled, and still more than Pascal. Think this benchie pretty much ends the async on Maxwell question as well. Not that im complaining about performance in this, if games were like this then I would've alot less cynical abit DX12 and Vulkan.
Guess i found my first Time spy bug, been trying to run time spy on my brand new ASUS ROG GL552VW, score is.....302!!!.. :3eyes: not kidding:bang: did not expect much but this is just sad, knowing my score with fire strike is around 4090 marks! again not much found out time spy is only loading with the integrated intel 530 contacted future mark support hope they'll have a fix soon.
Its running on a igpu for some reason. I would not expect much from GL552VW and 960m tho. If im not mistaken, i've seen someone here running this on a laptop, 980m it worked fine.
Does this score seem about average for the given hardware used? I really dont have an idea here?? Thanks http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13257929
10,248 my 3 year old LCS 290X tri crossfire 1140/1550 and 3960x at 4.6 and stock gskill sniper DDR3 at 2133: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13229436
i know it's running on the IGPU and seems i'm not the only one on the future mark forums with this problem. was not expecting mush from the 960M to start with..but the erge to bench marks:nerd:...still...was expecting score like 1500 .. a score of 302 is waaay to low.
So what sort of scaling are people getting in multi GPU, saw someone claiming CF was not working, while my brother in law only getting around 75% with 2x980ti. My performance pretty much doubled though, which is a first with this system, so hoping it wasn't an anomaly.
Hello everyone, I have a problem. The Demo and two GPU tests works normally, but when I reach the CPU test, it instantly CTD with a "stopped working" message. In the end I get a valid GPU score, but my total and CPU score remains at 0! Does anyone have any idea why is this happening? http ://i.imgur.com/6ohGLMi.jpg PS: i tried both 32 and 64 bit versions. (and not able to post links before i reach 10 posts, so just delete space between http and : )
