Intel Core i7 4770K Haswell Benchmarks Surface

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Mar 18, 2013.

  1. StewieTech

    StewieTech Chuck Norris

    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    934
    GPU:
    MSI gtx 960 Gaming
    It seams i´ll be running my 3570k as people have been running their 920s for years.
     
  2. yasamoka

    yasamoka Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,875
    Likes Received:
    259
    GPU:
    Zotac RTX 3090
    Real problem is not the dieshrink, nor the 3D transistors. The real problem is the thermal paste used between the CPU die and the integrated heatspreader instead of fluxless solder like before. This is why many enthusiasts "delid" their CPUs and replace the stock Intel thermal paste with an aftermarmet thermal interface material (Coollaboratory Liquid Metal Ultra, or other non-metallic thermal paste).
     
  3. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    yeah im not buying another quad core..
     
  4. The_Fool

    The_Fool Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2xGIGABYTE Windforce 7950
    I'd rather see better performance per core instead of more than four cores, at least for gaming.
     

  5. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    The only reason I even got that 3770k was because I got it and that Sabertooth z77 for next to nothing. Otherwise I wouldn't of bothered with it.
     
  6. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,206
    Likes Received:
    4,118
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3080
    Actually the thermal paste has nothing to do with it. It's the gap between the IHS and the chip.

    http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=34053183&postcount=570

    I mean yeah obviously better paste makes a small difference, but the vast majority comes from removing the glue. So if you delidded and didn't remove the glue as good as you should -- go back and do it, you'll drop much further.

    Not really, it's just moved to things don't effect gamers.
     
  7. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    whats up with the rig in your specs? another client rig?
     
  8. hallryu

    hallryu Don Altobello

    Messages:
    11,381
    Likes Received:
    15
    GPU:
    2x HD7970
    Looks like I'll be running my 3770k delid for a while yet. Somewhat glad, as I fancy a top of the range Lian Li case next anyway! We are quite sad aren't we?! lol :p
     
  9. (.)(.)

    (.)(.) Banned

    Messages:
    9,089
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 970
    @^))K gonna last me awhile yet.

    Edit:2600k
     
  10. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,402
    Likes Received:
    421
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    My old "980X" is still going strong. I have no intention of changing this chip for the forseeable future, unless something epically awesome (IB-E?) comes along and utterly annihilates it in terms of performance and overclockability, but given this will 4.6 GHz, i'm not worried. Still tweaking the OC at the minute for absolute max performance, but the old beast has a lot to give.
     

  11. Fender178

    Fender178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,194
    Likes Received:
    213
    GPU:
    GTX 1070 | GTX 1060
    Not bad scores for the 4770k.
    Well I am interested in that i5 4670k. I was eying a 2500K but that processor might not be available in a years time when I upgrade the rig that I have now due to the fact that CPU is going to be EOL at some point. Plus upgrading to a 3570k after the Haswell processors are released would be pointless. With my current rig any i5 or i7 CPU would be a huge upgrade for me.
     
  12. Veteran

    Veteran Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,094
    Likes Received:
    21
    GPU:
    2xTitan XM@1590Mhz-CH20
    zzzZZZzzz
     
  13. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    Yea. helping my father in law out part time until things slow down. Tax season is pretty much balls to the wall around here.
     
  14. Anarion

    Anarion Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,599
    Likes Received:
    386
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
    It looks like I'm not upgrading anytime soon. Might skip Broadwell too.
     
  15. The Chubu

    The Chubu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSi GTX560 TwinFrozrII OC
    This is what im wondering aswell.

    Well see how power efficient is once the reviews come out. Intel has been puking rainbows about Haswell power efficiency, need to see how much truth is in that.
     

  16. eclap

    eclap Banned

    Messages:
    31,468
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    Palit GR 1080 2000/11000
    is SB TDP around 65W? iirc. I'll be skipping Haswell too, same as Anarion, will probably skipp Broadwell as well.
     
  17. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    K series was 95w. S series was 65w
     
  18. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    95w according to cpuz
     
  19. eclap

    eclap Banned

    Messages:
    31,468
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    Palit GR 1080 2000/11000
    weird, thought IB had higher TDP than SB, or does IB have higher TDP when overclocked?
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2013
  20. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,206
    Likes Received:
    4,118
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3080
    They moved the VRMs off the motherboard and integrated them into the CPU. So instead of having like 75w CPU and 25w motherboard, they have like 84w CPU and 5w motherboard. Also the CPU can now shift states much, much faster.
     

Share This Page